By Pam Martens and Russ Martens of Wall Street on Parade
It is not a promising development for changing the culture of Wall Street when today’s newswires are reporting the sordid details of how the big Wall Street player, Barclays, engaged U.S. law enforcement in an attempt to hunt down the identity of an internal whistleblower. More on that in a moment, but first some background.
After discovering that Wall Street’s mandate to fairly and efficiently allocate capital had morphed into the manufacture of fraudulent securities with triple-A ratings that blew up the U.S. economy in 2008 with the impact of a flamethrower at a fireworks factory, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation in 2010 to, ostensibly, put Wall Street back on a straight and narrow path. One of Dodd-Frank’s sections expressly prohibits retaliation against whistleblowers and provides whistleblowers legal remedies if they are discharged or retaliated against. Another section provides potentially hefty awards through the Securities and Exchange Commission if the whistleblower provides original information which leads to a successful enforcement action with sanctions of over $1 million.
The whistleblower section of Dodd-Frank likely came about as a result of investigations showing that internal whistleblowers of the big Wall Street banks had indeed warned of fraud and malfeasance in the leadup to the crash, only to be barred from the premises or have their job eliminated, as in the case of Richard Bowen of Citigroup or Alayne Fleischmann of JPMorgan Chase, respectively.
Then there were the gifted writers who had neither the stomach nor moral blinders needed to sustain their careers on Wall Street. Instead, they used their knowledge to warn the American people in meticulous detail that the culture had been hopelessly corrupted. People like Nomi Prins, formerly of Goldman Sachs; Michael Lewis of Salomon Brothers; and Frank Partnoy of Morgan Stanley come to mind…